Example report. This business is fictional, written to show the shape of the output.
Scorecard
We could only read a small part of this website, so this score rests on limited evidence. Treat it as provisional — the gaps below are more reliable than the number.
Delivery is the strongest thing here. Two site leads running jobs, a consistent portfolio across eight schemes, twenty years without an apparent reliability problem — that is a real asset and it scores accordingly. The problem is that every stage before the job starts runs through you personally, from memory. Work arrives when someone remembers you, enquiries land in an inbox with nothing recording them, pricing takes five days against a sector norm of two, and nothing at all happens after the invoice. Those are not four independent weaknesses; they are the same weakness four times, which is that the commercial side of this business is one person's week. Two further stages — how you qualify enquiries and how you close a job out — we could not see at all, so they are marked as not visible rather than counted against you.
Scored against other commercial interior fit-out firms. The percentile is an estimate from sector norms, not a measurement.
Growth & scalability — 26
Every commercial stage routes through the owner: finding work, answering enquiries and pricing are all one person's week [own-1]. That matches the weak anchor — growth capped by one calendar, with a single point of failure. Delivery being shared with two site leads is the only thing lifting this above the floor.
Evidence: your answer
Customer journey & conversion — 33
No enquiry form, no stated response time, no logging, and replies taking one to three days [web-4, own-1]. The median anchor requires at least a contact route someone reliably answers; response here depends on where the owner is that week, which sits below it.
Evidence: Contact (musterbau-interiors.example), your answer
Workflow maturity — 38
Of the six stages we could see, two are absent, three ad hoc and one defined. Qualification and handover were skipped and are excluded from this score rather than counted against it. That distribution matches the weak-to-median band: delivery is repeatable, everything commercial around it is not.
Evidence: your answer, Recent projects (musterbau-interiors.example)
Positioning & messaging — 44
Services are clear and the sector is implied, but no customer is named and the claims are the trade's default vocabulary [web-1, web-2]. That is the median anchor almost exactly — competent, and indistinguishable from competitors.
Evidence: Musterbau Interiors — commercial fit-out (musterbau-interiors.example), About us (musterbau-interiors.example)
Offer & monetisation — 50
Four services listed clearly with legible scope [web-1]. No value band, no packaging, no aftercare offer, so the proposition stops at the project. Sector median.
Evidence: Musterbau Interiors — commercial fit-out (musterbau-interiors.example)
Digital presence — 52
A working site with a real project gallery [web-1, web-3]. Findable by name, but nothing that would surface for someone searching the problem rather than the firm, and the LinkedIn page could not be read. Median.
Evidence: Musterbau Interiors — commercial fit-out (musterbau-interiors.example), Recent projects (musterbau-interiors.example)
Differentiation — 56
The delivery record and architect relationships are a genuine advantage and the portfolio supports it [web-3, own-1]. None of it is stated where a specifier would see it, which is the median anchor precisely: a real distinction that works only on people who already know.
Evidence: Recent projects (musterbau-interiors.example), your answer
Credibility & social proof — 64
Eight completed schemes with consistent photography and a twenty-year record [web-2, web-3] — above the median anchor's thin-proof description. Short of the strong anchor because there are no named clients, no testimonials and no visible accreditations, all of which are table stakes here.
Evidence: About us (musterbau-interiors.example), Recent projects (musterbau-interiors.example)
Select a stage to see the sector standard beside what we found.
Positioning — Improvised
Make it obvious who this business is for and why they are the right choice.
The sector standard: A stated sector and project value band, with a portfolio that visibly matches it.
What we found: The site presents Musterbau as a general commercial fit-out contractor without naming a target sector or project value band. The claims are the standard trade set and would read identically on a competitor's site [web-1, web-2].
The gap: No target sector or project value band is stated anywhere. The claims — experience, reliability, partnership — are the sector's default vocabulary and appear on most competitor sites unchanged [web-1, web-2].
Demand generation — Absent
Create a supply of new interest, rather than waiting for it to appear.
The sector standard: A maintained specifier list contacted deliberately and regularly.
What we found: The owner states that work arrives through prior clients and architect recommendation, with nothing active done to find new work [own-1].
The gap: There is no deliberate activity to generate opportunities — no maintained specifier list, no tracked lease events, no outbound of any kind. Work arrives when someone happens to think of you [own-1].
Capture & response — Improvised
Catch every interested party and get back to them before they cool off.
The sector standard: A structured enquiry form, same-day acknowledgement, every enquiry logged.
What we found: A phone number and generic inbox on the contact page, no enquiry form [web-4]. The owner replies between site visits, sometimes same day, sometimes three days, and nothing records enquiries [own-1].
The gap: A phone number and generic inbox, no structured enquiry route, no stated response time, and no record of who got in touch [web-4, own-1]. Replies take between one and three days depending on where you are.
Qualification — Not visible
Decide quickly which work is worth pursuing, before spending real effort on it.
The sector standard: A written checklist applied consistently before pricing begins.
What we found: No evidence found. The owner did not answer this question, and how a contractor decides which enquiries to price is not visible from public material.
Pricing & proposal — Improvised
Turn interest into a priced offer, accurately and fast enough to still be in the running.
The sector standard: A maintained rate library and reusable proposal template, quoted within 48 hours.
What we found: The owner surveys the site then builds the quote from the last similar job, taking most of a week [own-1]. No rate library or proposal template was described.
The gap: Quotes are rebuilt from the last similar job rather than priced from a maintained rate library, and take most of a week [own-1]. The sector norm for work of this value is around 48 hours.
Delivery — Defined
Do the work, to the standard promised, without losing the margin that was priced in.
The sector standard: A tracked programme, documented variations, and a regular client update rhythm.
What we found: Two named site leads run jobs, materials are ordered on booking, and the owner signs off at completion [own-1]. The gallery shows eight schemes of consistent quality [web-3]. Programme tracking and variation control were not described.
Handover & payment — Not visible
Close the work cleanly and get paid without friction.
The sector standard: Structured snagging with documented sign-off and an agreed payment window.
What we found: No evidence found. The owner did not answer this question, and snagging and payment practice are not visible from outside.
Why we couldn't see it: This question was skipped. Snagging process, sign-off and payment terms are not visible from outside, so we have no basis to judge them.
Retention & referral — Absent
Turn one customer into more work, which is the cheapest work available.
The sector standard: Planned contact after handover and a testimonial requested on completion.
What we found: The owner states plainly that nothing happens after the invoice unless the client calls [own-1].
The gap: No planned contact after handover, no tracking of client refurbishment cycles, and no testimonial or referral request while goodwill is highest [own-1].
In fit-out these stages overlap more than the list suggests: aftercare on one project is usually where demand generation for the next one actually happens.
The back half of this operation is sound and the front half barely exists. Delivery is competent and the portfolio supports that. But everything upstream of the site — how work is found, captured and priced — runs on the owner's memory and availability, which caps the volume of work Musterbau can pursue at whatever one person's week allows. Two stages could not be seen at all: qualification and handover were not described, and neither is visible from public material, so they are reported as unknown rather than guessed at.
There is no deliberate activity to generate opportunities — no maintained specifier list, no tracked lease events, no outbound of any kind. Work arrives when someone happens to think of you [own-1].
Pipeline volume is entirely outside your control, so a quiet quarter is something you discover rather than something you saw coming. In a sector where idle teams destroy margin, that is the most expensive gap on this list.
Evidence: your answer
No planned contact after handover, no tracking of client refurbishment cycles, and no testimonial or referral request while goodwill is highest [own-1].
You are walking away from the cheapest work available to you. Every completed project is a client who will refurbish again on a broadly predictable cycle, and you have no mechanism to be there when they do.
Evidence: your answer
A phone number and generic inbox, no structured enquiry route, no stated response time, and no record of who got in touch [web-4, own-1]. Replies take between one and three days depending on where you are.
Anyone who reaches out while you are on site has no signal that they will be answered, and you have no idea how many enquiries you have lost, because nothing records them.
Evidence: Contact (musterbau-interiors.example), your answer
Quotes are rebuilt from the last similar job rather than priced from a maintained rate library, and take most of a week [own-1]. The sector norm for work of this value is around 48 hours.
On competitive enquiries you are frequently third to respond, which loses jobs you were well placed to win. Your estimating capacity is also one person's calendar, so two enquiries in the same week become a queue.
Evidence: your answer
No target sector or project value band is stated anywhere. The claims — experience, reliability, partnership — are the sector's default vocabulary and appear on most competitor sites unchanged [web-1, web-2].
An architect deciding who to put on a tender list has nothing to distinguish you from four other contractors, so the decision falls back to who they used last time. That is a competition you only win by accident.
Evidence: Musterbau Interiors — commercial fit-out (musterbau-interiors.example), About us (musterbau-interiors.example)
This question was skipped, and how a contractor decides which enquiries to price cannot be seen from public material. We have no basis to judge it either way.
If it is informal, the risk is that a five-day quote gets spent on work that was never winnable — but we cannot tell from here whether that is happening.
This question was skipped. Snagging process, sign-off and payment terms are not visible from outside, so we have no basis to judge them.
If handover is informal, final accounts typically drag and payment slows — but that is a general sector pattern, not a finding about this business.
Holding up to the standard: Delivery.
Commercial fit-out is a margin-on-project business where the money is made or lost before work starts. Pricing accuracy and speed to quote determine which jobs you win; programme control and variation management determine whether the won job is profitable. Because projects are discrete and lumpy, firms live or die on pipeline continuity — the gap between finishing one job and starting the next is the single biggest destroyer of margin in the sector.
What separates strong firms
How firms here typically stall
4 pages read, plus your own description of the business.
Could not read
This audit reads public signals and your own description. It is an estimate for orientation, not professional advice, and it cannot see what your business does off the record. 10 model calls, 158,600 tokens.
This site stores a little to work at all — which reports are yours, your language, this choice. None of it tracks you or leaves the site. Separately, allowing us to count how the app gets used helps us fix the parts people get stuck on. What we store